Assuming you were a good enough modeller to begin with it would have no issue going to octane with marked seams, UVs etc and having the materials set up in octane THAT is the result your seeing.
Lets assume I hire you to model something in blender but the end result is going to be put into octane render, it really doesnt matter since the materials would be set up there. Its not totally uncommon for studios to let people model in whatever they want providing the studio has the license for it or you have a license for it. Hotkeys will be different sure maya has tools and not modifiers etc but again its the same thing. Now you dont have to watch the entire thing, but see if you can find speed modelling or a tutorial on modelling anything and compare it to other software for modelling it will be fundamentally the same thing. Those renders are with octane render, c4d is just the modelling. If you had many average quality c4d artists using c4d compete with an advanced blender artist using blender, the blender artist would probably win I agree with the rethink you said about the quality depending on the artist. I'm not knocking blender, it has been used to make the most vivid renders and out of overall specs is best by far thanks to the fact it's free but if you were to only judge by quality cinema 4D wins. It pains me to say it but clients insist on sending archicad files every once in a while. And if your doing a lot of archviz (commercially) 3DS Max and Archicad.
Or corona if you're doing a lot of archviz.
Its akin to believing buying a fender stratocaster suddenly makes you sound like Eric Clapton, Jimi Hendrix etc.Īlthough, if you have the money. Judge the artist.Īlthough cycles is missing a few things, bi-directional path tracing is one (luxrender is free and has bidirectional path tracing though) Postat inițial de EleMental: (video-tutorial-added)
0 kommentar(er)
